Saint Anthony said, "A time is coming when men will go mad. They will take hold of you and say, 'You are mad. You are not like us.'" Welcome to the modern world. “I see myself as neither scientist nor religionist, but as a human being prepared to use various ways of knowing in the pursuit of truth. - Michael Cremo.” Why? Because what we do not know can kill us, or enslave us.
As an old man - having seen a few things in his life, - there are two sets of lips missing in this photo.
Can you connect the dots......
DO YOU THINK SHE IS SPECIAL TO HILARY? SHE IS HILARY'S AIDE, AND THE WIFE OF FORMER CONGRESSMAN ANTHONY WEINER. HER MOTHER BELONGS TO THE WOMEN'S MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, HER FATHER AND BROTHER BELONG TO THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND YET MICHELLE BACHMANN VICIOUSLY ATTACKED BY THE CRY BABY JOHN MCCAIN FOR INFORMING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT HILARY'S SPECIAL " FRIEND." What influences so you think swayed Hilary Clinton's non-action when Americans were calling for help in Benghazi? Why would she withdraw security forces in advance of the attack, when the security experts on the ground were asking for MORE security not less? It was because of the false narrative from the Muslim Brotherhood, that American/Islamic relations were entering a peaceful phase, as we had officially accepted our Dhimmihood! Dhimmis don't have the RIGHT to defend themselves against "righteous Muslims."
http://aggreen.net/other_orthodox/other.html Who is the REAL ALFRED GREEN - What sort of a man is the famous keeper of the page: "Religious Groups That Use
'Orthodox' in Their Names
But Are Not Canonical
Eastern Orthodox Churches"
For years I thought Alfred Green was merely a simple minded and misguided soul on a mission; I kept him in my prayers even though 24 hours a day, 7 days a week he slanders us with his webpage. But rather than being a light of orthodox correctness and a man trying in his simple way to share his faith and guide others, he is quite another fellow.
He engaged me on my personal facebook page, pushing his Republican Party brand of "correctness." We had never before conversed about anything, person to person, except on three different occasions over a period of fourteen years, where upon I politely requested he remove our name from his list, or to list it properly, and was each time rebuffed with a scoff. In a short six minute exchange, on my personal face book page, he cursed me in front of my wife, my children, my grand children and some 1000+ other friends, relatives and acquaintances.
Here is the exchange; I think it is very telling.
For a period of fourteen years, Alfred Green has operated a smear campaign against any religious group he decided was not orthodox, according a very narrow definition of Orthodoxy. The implication of his pages was always the groups listed were "fraudulent" and usurping the name Orthodox from the Eastern Orthodox Church.
His page is entitled, FRAUDULENTLY, "Religious Groups That Use
'Orthodox' in Their Names
But Are Not Canonical
Eastern Orthodox Churches"
For this definition of non-orthodox to have been true and real he would have had to list some of the very oldest Orthodox Churches in the world, churches that trace their founding to that first generation of Apostles, like Great Coptic Church of Egypt, The Great Malabar Orthodox Church of India, The Ethiopian Orthodox Church, and a host of others. Even though he stated his claim many, many times that his goal was to list every organization not in "canonical union" with SCOBA - the standing council of orthodox bishops in america - in practice he only listed groups in the U.S. some who are Orthodox and some who are not.
He has for more than a decade listed The Brotherhood of Orthodox Servants of Jesus on his list as "other" meaning not Orthodox, even though he would not list our bishop on the list anywhere. Our bishop is a fifth generation Orthodox Priest and son of a Ukrainian Orthodox Martyr, who at this point in time is more than fifty years an Orthodox Priest, and more than forty years an Orthodox Bishop and a founding member of SCOBA. The duplicity of this fellow Al Green, is that he will not list our Bishop as 'other than orthodox' because he knows that is not so. Yet, he will list our ministry, canonically received by our Bishop, as "other than orthodox." This is shameful and a lie and has been for fourteen year.
Until Allfred Green, chose to curse me in front of my family, I was willing to leave Allfred Green to his own misery. But from now on when anyone searches for his name, or his site, they will also find this page. What I've posted is here Allfred Green, In his own words.
During the course of the last twenty-four years, as the New World Order (NWO) redoubled its march to world government, I have witnessed the Scientistic Dictatorship Elite (SDE)- who are the collective force behind the NWO try various methods and experiments to create general insurrection in the U.S.
First there was the Rodney King riots. I watched CNN and other news media do everything in their power to create a general insurrection. They ended up creating only race riots, isolated mostly to black neighborhoods.
CNN, ran this video, over and over for months, building racial hatred. Actually I'm being generous because CNN actually only ran the most violent 7 seconds of it over and over and over and over and over for MORE THAN A YEAR.
Of course when the jury found the LA police Not Guilty, racial hatred exploded. But that did not succeed in creating the hoped for "general insurrection."
Reginal Denny ten years later.
Next there was Ruby Ridge.
The Next was the Waco assault and insults. It was nothing but a huge experiment in oppression of citizens by excessive police power with the purpose of gauging public reaction. Yes, 28 children died for this SDE purpose in Waco. Remember, the compassionate (NWO Attorney General) Janet Reno explaining why they killed the children "to save them."
Next there was Oklahoma City, the Murrah Federal Building.
Next was the Y2K hysteria. In case you doubt the motivation to create general insurrection:
None of these provocations worked. The SDE/NWO needed something else. Along came 9/11.
Ever wondered by Martin Sheen went nutz?
Alex Jones, the "hype-miester"
At this point FINALLY the SDE/NWO had what they needed to "Declare A National Emergency" invoking the "Emergency Powers Act." That Declaration happened on 9/14/2001. Since that time our constitution have been suspended, and the Executive Branch (first Bush then Obama) have ruled with total Dictatorial Powers.
If the insane response to Hurricane Katrina was a mystery to you, why thousands of good hearted patriotic American who lined I-10, for miles in both direction out of New Orleans, with their boats in tow, ready to rescue en masse, were turned away at gun point, by guns held in the hands of foreign troops on American Soil - wonder no longer.
Refusing to allow the evacuation, the sociologist remained to observe. The elite media didn't have trouble getting food and water while the masses suffered in unimaginable suffering.
Remember, tens of thousands of Americans with boats showed up to help in Katrina, which was the American Tradition, Americans helping Americans. WHY did they turn US away??????????????????????????? They would not let us in, and they held the dying at gun point to die - THAT IS THE FACT.
Because Malthusian Lucifercians are in control and we have to take control back. They are using ever opportunity to reduce the human population.
The Conquering of American Self-Governance by the New World Order: The three questions sane people have to ask: (a) Where are we? (b) How can we discover it? (c) What do we do now? This article is only toward understanding where we are by present "proofs." We don't have to be experts in the history to accurately assess where power rests at this moment. Let us analyze in this regard - how much legal power is left to "the people." Whether Obama Care becomes history or not is a moot point, since the "Robert's Supreme Court Precedent of June 28th 2012" gave the federal government unlimited taxing powers and thus unlimited powers of coercion. Bill Whittle has it close to right, and absolutely right on this issue of coercion:
Unlimited powers of coercion, on the face of it, destroys all "legal" resistance to ANYTHING. It nullifies any legal redress - it is a completely NEW paradigm.
When the government coerces you to do something or not do something, under the OLD paradigm you would naturally say, "They can't make me do that! I'm gonna sue." However, under the NEW paradigm it goes like this: You get a lawyer, he writes a brief summarizing your claim of injury or discrimination or just challenging the state's right to do the thing. He presents it to the judge and under the ROBERTS Precedent, he HAS (present tense - has) no LEGAL choice but to dismiss the case with prejudice as "without grounds."
Sadly as difficult as it is to say and to hear this was the final straw that broke the back of any constitutional constraint upon government. The SOLE purpose of the Constitution was to "restrain the power of government." It has failed; it is no longer the law of the land. There is a new law of the land and it isn't pretty:
FACT:
We are living under a LEGAL dictatorship, created by every administration after Ronald Reagan. When George Herbert Walker Bush touted "The New World Order" he wasn't using poetic language. He was talking about concrete international government that is and was antithetical to our constitution and sovereignty. At this point they have succeeded, the constitution is voided, our sovereignty gone: How can we know it not by history, but by the actual facts of present circumstances, by current events as it were? To Wit:
The Scientistic Dictatorship Elite's, Brave New World Order, (SDE): The United States is now in the exact same position as Europe; there is no qualitative difference. The international banking establishment, which was the first and successful assault force of the S.D.E. has the economies of Europe and the U.S. solidly in its control. (Some people refer to this international economic block of wealth controlling all central banks as "The Banksters", wordplay on Gangsters.)It has been a 100 year and successful operation. No time for the history of it here, but there are many books written on the subject. Economically they are in TOTAL control. In truth the murky association behind that power PRESENTLY rule, Europe, China, and the U.S. Each country is no longer Sovereign, but merely an administrative district in something yet to be named. The European Union/The North American Union. The European nations were taken down, their economies merged into a central control, their sovereignty abolished, their borders demolished by the forming first the European Common Market then forming that into the European Union. The United States was taken down by forming The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and merging that into The North American Union - upon whose laws we are presently operating. To Wit: (1) Obama's massive new immigration law (without the consent of congress) enacted by presidential fiat, under the expanded powers of "Emergency Power's Act." It is legal and is now the law of the land. Note that we have been operating under a virtual dictatorship, since 9/14/2001, under a constant "state of national emergency" giving to the President dictatorial powers. Obama on June 26th 2012 declared a double state of emergency. He declared an "international state of Emergency" which gives international bodies the right to "intervene" inside the U.S., and a "national state of emergency" which renews his own dictatorial powers. The "International State of Emergency" dissolves any pretense of "sovereignty." At this point congress is a "show body" government widow dressing, like the Duma was under Stalin - with virtually no powers. The real power rest somewhere else. In the Old Soviet Union, the power behind the scenes was "public" or at least known, since the real power was the Communist Party, and the "Party Congress" was the real expression of that. The REAL power behind our dictatorship is real, but still only partially exposed. There are books written on who they are. In the very near future they will show themselves - or maybe better, IT, will show ITSELF. What most people have failed to realize is that the Supreme Court has also become a "show court," without real power. Whether Justice Roberts was coerced into writing his insane and horrible June 28th ruling or not, the fact remains that under The Emergency Powers Act, the president had the power to coerce him to so rule. I think Justice Roberts sent us an S.O.S. in the wording of the ruling where he said that it was not the responsibility of the court to protect the public from bad laws passed by the people THEY elect. Well, under the OLD paradigm that would be a stupid statement, since there were Constitution protections with Constitutional limits. But IF those limits were nullified, without massive public protest, in fact with public approval, then those bad laws were, de facto, the present law of the land. And this is exactly what has happened. This is the situation, a series of laws designed to protect us, when we were under attack, were passed, (Liberty paid for security) - which have NOW been invoked, post 9/11 and constantly renewed to this very day. The Supreme Court is without power, Congress is without power. Only the Emergency Powers, stated clearly in The Emergency Power Act - hold legal right at the moment to be called the law of the land. There is still real and true resistance in 27 States, but the remainder have capitulated. And in some places our last line of legal defense is our elected county sheriffs, who are still honoring their having sworn to "uphold, defend and protect the Constitution of The United States of America". Those politicians who swore the same, while destroying the Constitution are Traitors and agents of "foreign powers." Standing against these states is the force of the U.S. Military and the recently created, NorthCOM - Command: The "Posse Comitatus" act, which many ignorant Libertarians and Constitutionalists thought was part of the Constitution, was abolished completely in the last Defense Authorization Act. In U.S. law, it is now completely voided and will not be mentioned again except by historians. The Posse Comitatus Act was already effectively abolished by George Bush with a "signing statement." The reason presidential "signing statements" came into use under Bush was that he, under the Emergency Powers Act, had the legal right to nullify ANY law, or part of any law, dully passed by congress. So, in truth the Posse Camitatus act has been void since 2008, when Bush stationed troops under the "NorthCom" Command, with mission statement of police powers INSIDE the U.S. - SO NOW, U.S. troops can be legally called upon to fire on U.S. Citizens, IF those U.S. citizens are deem by the president to be "A threat to national security" or it may be used to occupy rebellious states, even administer occupation state governments. And when we say "fired upon" we don't mean rifle fire during civil unrest, but missiles fired from drones. And Yes, the drones have already been deployed. The North American Union: Note by presidential fiat, the recent destruction of any semblance of border security - shutting down border check points, removing border patrols etc., etc. The North American Small Arms Treaty: It is not in the future, it is done, signed in secret, initially reported and then silence. Under the Emergency Powers Act it does NOT need congressional approval. When and how they will actually disarm us remains to be seen. With the new federal powers of taxation, I think they will merely tax ammunition into oblivion and confront only the people who have made large gun and ammo purchases, which they have been monitoring for decades. As Waco showed us, less than one gun per household member is considered by the ATF to be "stockpiling weapons." However, the technological weapons of the state have grown so powerful, "arms" in our traditional understanding are a moot point.
Vis a Vis this election: Nothing that happens in the next year will make any REAL difference. But it might make a cosmetic difference, IF they decide that they need to placate the public, to buy more time by replacing the Puppet in the White House with a new Puppet. They have contracted with a private French firm to tally the national election result. That firm IS owned by George Soros. Folks tried to mount a lawsuit to void the contract. It was immediately and summarily dismissed. They filed in France to place observers inside the company - it was immediately and summarily dismissed. (Sound familiar) Since the U.N. is one of the arms (a very major arm) of the Scientistic Dictatorship Elite, it is little comfort that the company will welcome U.N. observers. ALL normal legal challenges against the Obama administration have been summarily dismiss, except the healthcare challenge, and the result of that challenge was catastrophic. - Now if you can accept it you know why there has been no serious legal challenge to his many immoral and unjust actions, like robbing the G.M. Stock holders, arbitrarily making up new bankruptcy laws, etc, etc, ad nauseum. Why so many lawsuits have been announced in the media and simply went no where, all being dismissed as "without grounds."
People are caught in denial of the real circumstances and are still thinking, strategizing and acting as if the rules of the Old Paradigm were in effect. They keep talking about electing a person to "Save the Republic" to "Save Constitutional Governance" - that is language of the Old Paradigm. Since they cannot face the reality of present circumstances, any solutions they advocate for the future are non-sense. You cannot battle an enemy you refuse to know. What Power Do WE as Citizens have left whereby we may express "The WILL of the People"? First of all we have to understand the difference between a Citizen and a Loyal Subject. A Citizen is bound by laws that do not violate his unalienable, God Given Rights as a human creature of The Creator, that is the Right to LIFE, Liberty and Property. A Citizen is not bound by any laws that violate, Life, Liberty and Property, or any laws that previous Citizens have not created and to which he or previous generations have not accented. A Loyal Subject is bound by laws the power structure imposes by fiat, having no voice in their creation nor implementation. It should not take a genius to discover that our status, although still cynically called, "citizen" has been effectively and literally reduced to that of a subject, and we AGREED TO IT, through Kansas v Hendicks, the Patriot Act, The Emergency Powers Act, the Several National Defense Authorization Acts and OUR Failure to guard against the power to International Treaty. So: As we have established, (1)The Constitution now is merely a historical document WITHOUT power of LAW. Obama governing by executive FIAT is LEGAL. His FIATS have force of law since the laws allowing it were laws passed, as Justice Roberts stated, by people WE elected, and are laws we allowed to stand and didn't challenge when we could have. (2) Since no citizen can be governed by executive Fiat, that is by laws to which he has not accented, we have de facto moved from the realm of "Citizen" to the realm of "Subject" - which require a new understanding of our rights. All talk of "Constitutional Rights" is Null and void, a futile exercise in the paradigm that is past. But we are not without RIGHTS! And those rights are REAL, and must be protected, by ANY measure anyone's imagination can muster to punish ANY who abridge our GOD GIVEN, UNALIENABLE RIGHTS to LIFE, LIBERTY and PROPERTY. The relinquishing of "SELF GOVERNANCE" which we have SURELY accomplished by destroying the MEANS of that Self-governance, in NO WAY voids our GOD GIVEN, UNALIENABLE RIGHTS to LIFE, LIBERTY and PROPERTY. And we must stand willing to sacrifice and pay ANY price, our LIVES, our WEALTH, our SACRED HONOR, to defend these rights which are the BASIC God GIVEN circumstance of the Human BEING. ANY DESPOT that subsumes to him/herself the right to abridge these rights is the ENEMY OF HUMANITY, and due summary judgement. Now we are in a struggle to stave off a slavery, a new feudalism, a dark ages unimaginable.
Obama and Gang: They have publicly telegraphed their willingness to imprison indefinitely, without charges, without trial, without right of habeas corpus, any whose philosophical, political, constitutional views they wish to deem - a threat to national security. Any person who believes in the basic truths of the Declaration of Independence and Constitutional Rule of Law ARE ALREADY classified as "potential enemies of the state" and "a possible threat to national security." I have the unclassified portion of the 2009-2010 Homeland security memorandum to local law enforcement, naming you and me as "potential terrorists." Obama recently upped the ante in the early part of June 2012 when he signed an executive order changing the wording of the "Emergency Power Act" from "deemed to be a potential terrorist" to "deemed to be a threat to national security." That is the EXACT same wording Stalin used to imprison millions. And IF you have actually read what I've written - you will know that the SCOTUS Precedent upon which this "prophapxactic" law is base is upon that Kansas v Hendricks 1997 Precedent (which was the legal right to imprison a man deemed SANE, but dangerous to society, held not for his crimes, but for his "potential to commit a crime", held but because government deemed him a threat to public safety, i.e. to society.) People scoffed at my concern back then when I explained what that ruling meant and that it was not being reported in the media and that it was MONUMENTAL. ALL the subsequent oppressive laws when challenged have been dismissed and not heard in court ON THAT PRECEDENT. WE are FIFTEEN YEARS too late to save the Republic.
Playing out the present "option" - that is, playing out the game of this fake election - is a fantasy. If they decide to exchange puppets in the White House, it will only be for the benefit of Psychological Operations, propaganda purposes. If there is too much unrest, or it appears too many people are "getting it" they will place Romney in the White House. The simple minded with think they have gained something. But just as Obama who ran and the opposite of Bush, entered the White House and simply doubled down on EVERY Bush policy, so will follow if Romney replaces Obama. If this happens millions who are awake and watching will go back to sleep thinking "problem solved." They slept for eight years while Bush created the laws that Obama has exercised to take complete control. There is not reason to think they will be any smarter in the future. They are still battling this election as if it means something. They cannot wrap their minds and their emotions around THINGS AS THEY ARE, even when offered incontrovertible proof. For them a Satan in the White House is okay as long as they can hold onto the fantasy that he is their Satan. As I said, for survival, these three questions have to be the bedrock for any sane person, Where are we? How can we discover it? What do we do now?" We must learn our GOD GIVEN rights, a resist to the death any abridgment of them.
Young People - Do You Recognize These Words?
Do you know these words are your heritage - they belong to you, they are your legacy and NO international corporation, international government or organization, no Federal, State or Local Government nor any Branch of Government, including the President of the United States, The Congress, the Supreme Court, nor any Department or Agency of the government may take the ownership of these words from you nor remove your GOD GIVEN, LEGAL right to ACT upon this knowledge:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." - Text from the American Declaration of Independence.
There can be no greater "absolute Despotism" than a Federal Government that has subsumed to itself the right to tax you for ANY or NO reason. That is absolute power over you, in which there is NO freedom, only the coercion of the state to act as they want you to act. Grasp your freedom upon this LEGAL basis, sacrifice for you own generation and the generations to come. IT IS OUR ONLY COURSE OF ACTION. Well there is one more choice - We could submit, take the chip, give up and quit, accept the drug hazed death they have planned for us. Or We CAN come to know that BEING who CREATED us, who will sustain us, whose POWER can topple ANY tyrant.
The Sharia Compliant NeoCon/Marxist/Muslim Axis is the present form of the silent war upon Christianity and Judaism in America, by the Scientistic Dictatorship Elite's (SDE) "New World Order." (NWO)
TRUTH HAS NO AGENDA: At Least That Is What Glen Beck Thinks.
Truth most certainly does have an agenda and that agenda is the survival and well being of humankind. This is as certain as the fact that Lie has an agenda, the harming and ultimate destruction of humankind. One is life engendering, the other life destroying.
Let us take the issue of Global Warming as an example of our battle between truth and lie.
First, there is nothing right wing or left wing about objective evidence. If it is indeed objective evidence then it is proof and not fantasy. If you read my article on Education (How We Think Determines What We Think: The Devolution of Education in America) you will understand the next paragraph. The need to "believe" in Global Warming reflects not just a simple flaw in character or blind spot that could be easily corrected by hearing the truth. It is the result of developmental conditioning, imbedded deep into the psyche.
The global warming mythology was calling on "the feel good response" (I'm a nice person; I care about the environment), what the Behaviourist call "belongingness." Those so programmed clung to that feeling of self-worth created by adherence to the mythology to the point that when the vast majority of the raw data was exposed to have been manipulated, they couldn't believe it. All they could do was demonise the people pointing out the error. Why?
When it was proved that there had been no consistent temperature measuring to the accuracy they were trying to extract from the data, over the periods they were examining, it was ignored. But the people pointing out the objective facts were demonised. Why?
When NASA admitted that from actual satellite observation measurements, that the amount of heat that is radiated from the atmosphere into outer space was far greater than any of the climatologically models suggested, they ignore it. Why?
This fact alone totally destroyed the theory of "greenhouse effect" upon which Global Warming was constructed. But by this time "science" (read that again) "The science" had become so completely removed from objective observation and fact (that is removed from Truth) that the NASA scientists actually sat on the satellite data for more than three years fearing to release it for fear of being savagely attacked by the "scientific establishment" and the media, and having their funding gutted by the administration! It wasn't until Obama gutted their funding anyway that they released the objective findings. Absolutely amazing!
If the population could be so violently pro Global Warming that they could not entertain this clear contrary data, how much less could they entertain the ideas that there were more subtle defects in the theory; like that the various climatologically models did not agree, or the idea that there still at this late date might be factors in the regulation of the earth's atmosphere of which we know nothing. This isn't merely stubborn narcissism; personal obtuseness. This is the masses being controlled and manipulated by the elite.
Creating a malleable population has been a long range project of the Progressives. They have been at it for more than one hundred years and totally in control of education for the last forty years. (Again I suggest reading the article mentioned in paragraph one)
Some people believe that the problems in America and the world would be solved if only the right and the left would meet in the middle, what I call "blind and stupid radical moderation." One has to ask: How could this have possibly helped in this confidence-game that has been the conspiracy of Global Warming? What moderation is possible against an agenda that is totally false? Would we really be better served by ceding any part of belief to a totally unproved theory?
Those educated in our public school system in the last 40 years are likely to argue that "truth is relative, based simply the perceptions of the individual person and that person's perceptions have no ontological basis." This is really an amazing premise, especially when the same people were screaming red-faced about Global Warming, "the SCIENCE is settled" as if that was an objective truth.
In this instance (and many others) one cannot place on par those on the right who "don't want to believe" and those on the left "who will believe no matter what." This is a spurious paradigm and part of the propaganda Al Gore pushed to our school children. "Your parents are old, they don't want to believe." This is a relativistic argument of equivalency ignoring the reality of objective truth. It says "my truth is not your truth; your truth is not my truth, but somewhere in this muck of illusion and miscomprehension we must have common ground." Really? Common ground with a lie? It cedes to the Progressives the "idea" of truth, when it is not truth. It eliminates the possibility that objective observation might favour one side of the argument over the other, not withstanding ones political bent or agenda.
What that perception fails to grasp is that so called 'right wing' folk are likely to accept what is proved true. This was seen in the support for the original clean air and clean water act. This was objective; the places where the air and the water were in difficulty were observable; and where not observable to the human eye, "upon reason" the conservatives were willing to accept the readings of scientific measurements as to what parts contaminants were in the air and water. I'm not speculating, this is what happened. Everyone supported cleaning up the air and water and I could give many other examples of "conservative clarity."
However, manipulation via pseudo-science isn't new. When in the 1950s Progressivists tried to panic people into the belief in extremely limited natural resources, few rational people believed them. In the 1950s we were taught that by the late 1970s humankind would have used all the oil on the planet. We were the parasites sucking the planet's life blood dry. When in the 1970s the Progressivist began to try to panic people into enslaving laws by proffering the idea that "if we ALL (humankind) didn't do something quickly" we were about to enter a new ice age. (Yes this happened - the attempted panic not the new ice age.) Rational people were sceptical. Why? Because they knew the elite (read Utopian Planning Progressivists) had moved from the "realm of the objective" to the "realm of utopia creation." "We've all got to work together to keep this from happening"; meaning, more government, more centralize control, less individual rights, less national sovereignty.
Seeing their failures with "limited oil supply" and the fear mongering about a new Ice Age the Progressives were more patient with global warming. They tried to condition an entire generation to believe it with a massive propaganda program. Financed by what came to be known as "Crime Inc." Al Gore was commissioned to make a movie, the establishment lauded the movie, heaping awards upon it. Billions were spend on advertising and sending propagandists into the public schools as special guest speakers. Countless classroom hours were wasted on the subject. Text books were skewed to reflect this mythology. Meanwhile behind the scenes Crime Inc. set themselves up, creating with Chicago Mafia money the "Carbon Bank" in which a who's who list of Progressivist politicians and activists stood to earn hundreds of billions, potentially trillions of dollars.
Unaware of the criminal conspiracy, people of reason were willing to entertain the "possibility there was actual Global Warming." All they asked was credible objective proof. However, the first time a major piece of evidence was ignored by the "people of science" the people of reason recognized that the plot at work was yet another utopia creation effort, meaning more centralized control, less liberty, less individual rights, less national sovereignty, more international control, more distribution of wealth through carbon taxation and credits etc. It was a global, U.N./New World Order/elitists campaign for one world government on a Marxist model and nothing less. Now the lines are drawn with more clarity.
Young folks, I'm speaking to you, since you are the ones who will have to fight this battle. Global Warming is just one of the cons the Marxists have devised to take control of America and destroy Constitutional Rights and Liberties. If your generation wants to preserve American freedom, you've got a lot of remedial educating to do, but before you can do that, every person has to come to understand and see how easily they are manipulated by virtue of their "education via conditioning." Please read my article on Modern Education mentioned in the first paragraph and available on this blog site. You see, instead of an academic education capable of teaching critical thinking, if you are a product of public education and the mass media you are/were "conditioned by your education" instead of being educated. Without true academic education you are at the mercy of the "experts." You are like supplicants awaiting the next pronouncement from the Priestess at Delphi, or the tribesmen, awaiting the words of the shaman. The assaults on our freedom by the Progressivist are complex and multi-layered and Man Made Global Warming/Climate Change is just one front of a multi-front war.
Al Gore's financial interest in Global Warming Mythology exposed.
Lord Christopher Monckton Lecture exposing the fraud of Climate Change
National Press Club Debate Dr Richard Denniss vs Lord Christopher Monckton
Now for those who really don't want to face the fight, who really want to be radical middle of the road, everybody get along moderates, THINK! When one produces objective facts that destroy a "theory" and the person holding the theory answers, "You are evil, you are not like us." How much consensus do you really think is possible? +++
Why should we NOT take them at their word.
